Is it okay if I hate Memory Heap for his ability to write a freakin' 8 page, 4,000+ word ending to a story in a day?
This person is 100% correct.
I find his point to be a rather simplistic response requiring no thought. Every piece of fiction ever created is someone's baby. And the vast majority of it is unreadable/unwatchable.
The original
Superman movie would have aged a lot better if someone had walked in and told the writers/director not to do the fly really fast to make the world spin backwards and turn back time thingy (or his amnesia kiss in Superman 2). Or how neither Spielberg nor Kubrick(!) had the wisdom to realize
A.I. Artificial Intelligence was not going to work by stretching so far for a sentimental happyish ending. Or
Harry Potter's embarrassing Epilogue. Or
The Sapranos's ridiculous and pretentious ending.
Things happen and all artists mess up from time to time. Even masters like Spielberg and Kubrick. In my opinion, Memory Heap committed an error during the ending. Apparently, I was far from alone in thinking this.
Yes he COULD have gone into a funk and expended mountains of money to seek this lady and child but to me the inference was that competent private detectives were at a dead end......This happens!!!!
Honestly, I'm gonna have to swallow that one and live with it. Because that doesn't just happen. Not in this day and age. Unless you're actively avoiding detection or someone has made you disappear, a small team of quality detectives are going to find you. Even if you do move to Hungary for awhile.
Really, my bigger problem with that idea would be that "real" doesn't have to get in the way of a good story. Who cares if something conforms to reality if it diminishes the quality of a story? I mean, Michael Corleone could have chocked on an orange before the climax of the Godfather. It would have been arguably "real", but it would have made for a rather odd end to the movie and less satisfactory than the one we got.